Monday, June 14, 2010

Piece of Advice #44: Take a good hard look in the mirror

It is always a good idea before embarking on any venture to tally up your assets and liabilities. Business owners who do not do the math have an exponentially higher chance of going bankrupt. Job seekers who do not eagle eye their talents and abilities will find they won't go as far or find a position that fits their skills as neatly. And when dating, if you are not honest with yourself, you will find heartache and humiliation sure as not.

People hold dear the idea that love is about finding your soulmate and that those brave enough and with good hearts and intentions cannot help but find him or her in the dark miasma of the dating world. This is a lovely thought, but it's bunk. There is not a lid for every pot, no matter what your grandmother told you. Some pots have no lids.  Some pots throw away perfectly good lids in search for the best, most smoking hot lid possible. Some pots stay on the burner so long that their contents boil out and they crack. If you approach looking for love in a more practical way, you may, however, find more success.

The fact is that while there may not be a lid for every pot, there are quite a few lids out there, enough for most pots if they are not overly picky or completely full of themselves. It is essential then, that you do that very hard exercise of evaluating yourself as objectively as possible to see what you bring to the table.

One of the things women prefer not to think about is how visually motivated men are - meaning if they like what they see, they'll pursue it.  If not, they move on.  A woman can have a host of fantastic internal attributes and external accomplishments, and she's still subject to the "Hot or Not" rule.  It ain't fair.  And for those woman who are smarter than they are pretty, it really burns.  But it is what it is, so evaluate what you've got physically and see what you have to work with.  Be honest.  Be brutally honest.  The more honest you are, the more you sooner you can get working on your trouble spots.  While it's true that most of us get the faces we are born with, we do have control over our weight, the way we dress, and how put together we are generally.

Last night I wasted a good hour and a half watching Battle of the Bods on Hulu.com.  If you haven't seen it, the premise is that five women present themselves very scantily dressed to be ranked by a panel of three men.  There are three rankings: face, one body part (selected by the women as a group), and whole package.  The women have to guess how the men will rank them.  If their rankings match the men's rankings, they win money.  So there are battling incentives here for each woman: the need to be perceived as the hottest/most beautiful and the need to go home with some cash.  And because the money is won as a group and distributed evenly among the women, they need to nail down who is hot and who is not quickly and ruthlessly.  There isn't time for diplomacy.  

Here is one of the episodes I watched last night:



Some observations:
  • None of these woman are beautiful.  Only one is really "hot" and she has a hard face with a masculine aspect and a stripper's mannerisms.  
  • The four average or just above average women are all hanging on by their fingertips to the idea that they are beautiful.  And not just beautiful, but more beautiful than the rest. 
  • One wonders, if you took away everything that is fake about all the women's appearances - boobs, makeup, hair color, tanning, etc. - and then re-ranked them, would anything change?
  • Some of them are not only not beautiful, but pretty bitchy as well.
  • The men evaluating them are completely comfortable with this process and don't hesitate to knock the less attractive women down to the bottom of the heap.
What would also be interesting to see is a numerical ranking from the men, not a ranking of the women relative to each other.  Because I think some of these women would be surprised to find themselves rated a 5 on a scale of 1 to 10 (or below).  What seems to be the case here is that all these women think they are 8's and 9's and expect to be able to date and keep men who are also 8's and 9's when in reality they are out of that league except perhaps for short flings.  If they were more honest with themselves, they might 1) be able to address their physical flaws or, alternatively, work on their personalities 2) lower their expectations of what they can expect to attract on the dating market.  Clarity of vision might save them some heartache down the line as well as spare the male population their overweening hubris.

I have to say, it is beyond me why anyone would ever want to go on this kind of show and subject themselves to this.  You couldn't get me on Battle of the Bods unless you held a gun to my mother's head.  I do think, though, that a smarter strategy for one of these girls would be to immediately claim the #5 space.  This strategy would both disarm the other girls' suspicions and hostile competitiveness, and save face - because if the girl was hotter than the #5 space, the others would be forced to admit this publicly or lose money.  In any case, she would be in no danger of losing anything by being self-deprecating: she either is #5 and admits it, taking the sting out of the judgment, or she isn't and everyone else has to "persuade" her to take the higher ranking which makes her look two kinds of good.

    15 comments:

    1. @FB: Yep. Changed it. Blogger kept cutting out on me tonight, and I kept having to go back and rewrite/recode. Sorry.

      ReplyDelete
    2. I don't think it's ever good for a woman to self-deprecate too much in the company of other competing women, she ends up being railroaded.

      I used to do this myself and it always ended in disaster.

      If she is stand-out more attractive than the others, it looks like false modesty (people do spot this coming from beautiful people, and dislike it).

      If she is more or less the same as the others, she has allowed herself to be pigeonholed as least attractive.

      If she is significantly less attractive, obviously she shouldn't try to be at the top, but she might have a chance at second from the bottom, voting being what it is.

      What would help is an ability to accept where she is placed, combined with friendliness & consideration for others & a sense of humor as well as confidence that not everything in life depends on her bod (it is precisely when it does, that it is most important to be nonchalant).

      Don't underestimate the importance of a sense of humor on these shows, people have already remarked on this in the hostess.

      Women are hierarchial creatures and if you put yourself at the bottom of the hierarchy they will walk all over you and it is not my experience that men will intervene to protect you in this situation either, there are no white knights on reality tv, a girl has to look after herself.

      ReplyDelete
    3. You made an accurate assessment of those women and their beauty, or lack thereof anyway.

      ReplyDelete
    4. Ah, SDaedalus - I have exposed one of my weaknesses. In environments when I feel I can't win, I have a tendency not to compete at all. This is exactly the kind of thing I was always crap at: muscling out the competition in order to get noticed. Which is why I would never do reality TV. I'd also be terrible at it because I am naturally repulsed by human drama and avoid participation at almost any cost. So if you forced me to do this my first instinct would be to do whatever is necessary to draw the least attention to myself and then get the heck out as soon as possible. I wouldn't care about the money and I certainly would never think I could win the #1 spot.

      I agree with you that men allow women to sort these things out amongst themselves and the ones with the killer instincts usually do the sorting.

      ReplyDelete
    5. As far as a sense of humor goes, I don't think this show allows for showcasing of that. The women only get a second to say anything in introduction, and the hostess gets to make all the barbed comments, thus defining herself as the funny one.

      ReplyDelete
    6. Love the blog. You have a way of stating things with immense clarity. Keep it up!

      But I take minor issue (several actually) with the following:

      A woman can have a host of fantastic internal attributes and external accomplishments, and she's still subject to the "Hot or Not" rule. It ain't fair. And for those woman who are smarter than they are pretty, it really burns.

      1) More often than not, poor looks and poor personality are correlated. I keep hearing about all of these heavy plain women with really sweet personalities. I'm sure they exist somewhere, but...

      2) Women expecting men to be attracted to them based on external accomplishments is a misunderstanding of attraction, and I would argue a misapplication of the golden rule. Don't try to give me what you would want, try to give me more of what I actually want. My wife and I watch a dating show called "Baggage", and it always cracks me up to see the women try to flirt as if they were men. They talk about how adventurous they are, their career accomplishments, offer to teach the men something. Their grandmothers would have understood how laughable this is.

      3) A specific case of point 2 above, but intelligence isn't specifically an attraction builder for men. There will be a minimum threshold for each man, but other personality traits are much more important. I'm not saying intelligence is bad (I love the conversations I have with my smart wife), but this seems like something women in general really misunderstand. What I would say is if you are smart and don't think it makes you more attractive, it makes you more attractive (to a smart guy). If you are smart and think it makes you more attractive, you are judging yourself as if you are a man and in that sense a) overrating yourself and b) competing with him over who is the "better man".

      ReplyDelete
    7. Probably the best way to think of women's IQ is to compare it to height. Generally speaking, taller is better if you are a guy. Same goes for IQ (unless it makes you nerdy). Women seem to understand that they don't want to seem taller than their mate. They prefer men tall enough that they can wear high heels without being taller than him. My wife is very tall for a woman, but still shorter than I am. I think she looks fantastic, and she makes no apologies for her height. But if she had the attitude that her height was a significant part of her attractiveness, it would be very off-putting.

      Men and women both want the man to be the tall one, the strong one, the funny one, the smart one, etc. It is what it is. Women seldom date guys who are shorter than them, earn less, are less intelligent, weaker, etc. When they do most would see this as some sort of compromise.

      ReplyDelete
    8. Dalrock - thanks for commenting. I'm glad you're enjoying the blog. Your thoughts are very interesting to me, but I believe I will save my response for a blog I'm planning for tonight as the smart vs. pretty dilemma is one I'd like to further elaborate on. Again, thanks.

      ReplyDelete
    9. Looking forward to it!

      I posted some thoughts on this topic over at Roissy's blog too (see point 2 esp): http://roissy.wordpress.com/2010/06/10/texts-from-the-female-id/#comment-178818

      A few more thoughts as well:

      Think about what your best friends' first questions would be when you tell them you found the most incredible guy. Not the practical ones your parents might ask (is he sane, no criminal record, etc). But the loaded ones, the ones where they figure out how jealous they are. Now do the same thought exercise for a guy in the same situation (with guy friends).

      Another thought exercise, men vs women. How many women would be happy with others describing her relationship with the following statement: She's the smart one, he's the gorgeous one. Switch he and she and how many men would have a problem?

      ReplyDelete
    10. Be honest. Be brutally honest. The more honest you are, the more you sooner you can get working on your trouble spots.

      Good advice overall, but one caveat I would add is sometimes women are brutal about physical features which don't matter that much. In college I sold shoes, and women obsessed with the size, etc of their feet. Mothers would try to shoe horn their daughters into smaller shoes than fit because the right ones "look like boats". Then they would ask me for special shoes their orthopedic surgeon prescribed because they ruined their feet when young by wearing too tight shoes... I turned 40 this year, and I've never had another guy turn to me and say "Hey, did you see the feet on that one!"

      Never.

      ReplyDelete
    11. Dalrock - I agree on feet: not a big worry spot. I'd say figure (weight, flattering clothes), hair, decent, unobtrusive makeup that highlights her best facial features would be the stuff to concentrate on.

      I have really small feet which by the logic you outline above should be a draw - not in my experience.

      ReplyDelete
    12. I hated it when mothers brought in daughters of middle school or high school age. It was hands down the worst part of the job (and the Al Bundy skits about large women thinking they have tiny feet aren't entirely untrue). I didn't want to be a part of causing these girls pain later in life. There were probably a few exceptions where the right size didn't elicit nasty comments from the moms, but this was rare. Never from the dads though. They wanted what I wanted, shoes that would fit and be comfortable for the girl.

      Along the same lines, I think women place too much stock in the opinion of other women on what is physically attractive, and they assume that men do too. As Roissy says, the part that does the choosing isn't influenced by such things.

      So the girls on the show shouldn't have fought for a higher rank amongst their peers. They should have simply tried to look as pretty as possible. I confess I didn't watch the link but I'm highly confident the men didn't care a bit what the women said.

      ReplyDelete
    13. Dalrock - the men could only see the women, they couldn't hear what they were saying, so how they negotiated was not made a part of the ranking except for, I suppose, what came through in body language.

      I don't have a daughter, but if I did I would hope I wouldn't squish her big feet in tiny shoes to prove something to myself. That is awful.

      ReplyDelete
    14. "What seems to be the case here is that all these women think they are 8's and 9's and expect to be able to date and keep men who are also 8's and 9's when in reality they are out of that league except perhaps for short flings. If they were more honest with themselves, they might 1) be able to address their physical flaws or, alternatively, work on their personalities 2) lower their expectations of what they can expect to attract on the dating market. Clarity of vision might save them some heartache down the line as well as spare the male population their overweening hubris."
      Well said! Women's overvaluing their own attractiveness is a major problem in Australia. It is quite common for women who are quite unattractive (by way of being fat, ugly, having no personality or by simply not being pleasant to be around) to act as though the only top 1% of men are good enough for them. Of course, these are the same women that when most men don't approach them, complain of a "man drought". What a crock. If anything, Australia is in the grips of a woman drought. There are just no realistic, well-grounded classy ladies out there for Aussie men.

      ReplyDelete